Sarah's Library

2/10 - I found this a little disappointing as it was advertised in the blurb as being "a ghost story without any ghosts", but it didn't read like that at all.  I found it quite strange - there was a book within a book within a book (I was reading a book about a character writing a book about a mystery book that turns up after its author has died).  There were some points where I thought Auster might have been writing from a personal experience, especially since it's all in the first person, but written 20 years after the fact, and the main character is a male author.  I have a few other Paul Auster books on my to read list, hopefully they surpass this one in their ability to hold my attention.